Iran: l'escalade inévitable?
The speaker begins by drawing a parallel between the current situation with Iran and past conflicts, recalling Donald Rumsfeld's prediction of a short war in Iraq that ultimately lasted over 20 years, causing a massive humanitarian catastrophe and an embargo that killed 500,000 children. This is contrasted with claims of 30,000 deaths by the Iranian regime during foreign-influenced protests, emphasizing that geopolitics isn't driven by good sentiments but by seeking the best, or least bad, outcome. The consequences of past interventions are highlighted: over 3 million displaced in Iraq, the rise of ISIS (allegedly funded by the CIA), and the slave markets in Benghazi following the overthrow of Gaddafi in Libya. The speaker dismisses those who appeal to good sentiments as either "useful idiots" repeating media scripts or "true villains" like BHL, who was reportedly sentenced to 33 years in prison in Tunisia for conspiracy against the state.
The desire for war with Iran is presented as a long-standing objective, tracing back to Benjamin Netanyahu's 1995 claim that Iran was weeks away from possessing nuclear weapons. The speaker then critiques the perceived ineffectiveness of political leaders, citing Barack Obama's failure to close Guantanamo and Donald Trump's unfulfilled promise to end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours. The continued operation of Guantanamo, the ongoing war in Ukraine, the lack of prosecution for figures like Fauci, Bill Gates, Hillary Clinton, and Jeffrey Epstein's associates, are all presented as evidence that "patriots" are not in control, and that a deeper power structure, a "deep state," is at play. This deep state, according to Putin, cannot be overcome by hypothetical patriots but only by "we the people." Even serious figures like Jayvans are compelled to follow the narrative, such as claiming Iranians are preparing "nuclear vests," a tactic more associated with Israeli deterrence.
