Iran : le nouveau TACO est arrivé #Octogone82

This episode of "L'Octogone" features an interview with Pierre Jovanovic, a prolific author and publisher. The discussion covers a range of topics, from current geopolitical events to technological advancements and historical analyses. The conversation begins by promoting Jovanovic's upcoming book signings, highlighting his popularity and the success of his recent events. His website, quotidien.com, is mentioned as the place to find information about these signings. A significant portion of the discussion revolves around the recent US-Iran tensions, framed by a satirical image of Donald Trump eating a Taco Bell. The speakers criticize the "Taco Tuesday" narrative, suggesting it's a misnomer for "Trump Always Chickens Out." They argue that Trump's threats of nuclear strikes against Iran were a strategic maneuver to achieve an agreement that was essentially what Iran desired from the outset, but with added war reparations. This is described as the "Texas Sharp Shooter fallacy," where a target is painted after the shots are fired to claim intentionality. The speakers highlight the financial gains of Trump's inner circle through insider trading related to these events, contrasting it with Trump's promise to "drain the swamp." Nancy Pelosi is cited as an example of a politician whose portfolio performance has significantly outperformed market averages due to alleged insider trading. The conversation then delves into the broader issue of insider trading and corruption in Washington, drawing parallels to the film "Margin Call" and the role of networks and foresight over intelligence in finance. The speakers lament that Trump's promises to end such practices have not materialized, with his entourage continuing to profit from political decisions. A significant point of discussion is a tweet from the Pakistani Prime Minister that was accidentally published in draft form, revealing the behind-the-scenes nature of international diplomacy. The speakers speculate whether this was an intentional leak to ridicule Trump or a genuine mistake. They also touch upon the immense pressure Trump was under to extricate himself from the conflict with Iran, likening it to a "Captain Haddock plaster" that he couldn't remove. Trump's nuclear threats are seen as a desperate measure, amplified by Tucker Carlson's criticism. The speakers express concern over Trump's mental state, citing instances of him losing his train of thought, struggling to find words, and contradicting himself during press conferences. They suggest these are early signs of Alzheimer's. This is contrasted with the perceived disconnect of pro-Israel voices in France, particularly those in affluent areas, who interpret events as victories, while Israelis on the ground perceive them as strategic defeats and humiliations. The discussion then shifts to the perceived humiliation of Israel, with a critique of its military capabilities, including the Iron Dome and logistics. The ongoing conflict in Lebanon is also condemned. The speakers express skepticism about the ceasefire holding, pointing to the demand for the withdrawal of all combatants from the region as a major hurdle, especially given the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz to Israel's security. The ten points of the proposed Iran deal are then meticulously dissected. These include the US commitment to not attack Iran, the transfer of control of the Strait of Hormuz to Iran, authorization for uranium enrichment, the lifting of all sanctions (including Swift access), an end to secondary sanctions, the termination of UN Security Council resolutions, the end of IAEA resolutions on Iran's nuclear program, war reparations, withdrawal of all combatants from the region, and the disbandment of CENTCOM. The speakers express doubt about the feasibility of these points, particularly the disbandment of CENTCOM, which they argue is vital for Israel's existence. The conversation touches upon Elon Musk's regret for supporting Trump, given the backlash he has faced from the European Union. The Epstein scandal is revisited, with the speakers suggesting that Trump's stance on publishing the Epstein documents is related to his own potential involvement. They highlight the manipulation of Wikipedia for personal gain, citing examples of individuals paying to alter their pages. The involvement of Stanislas Dean, the scientific director of the French national education system, with Jeffrey Epstein is also raised as a concerning issue. The discussion touches on the "Clinton Body Count" theory, questioning the high number of reported deaths associated with the Clintons. The expulsion of a Telegraph journalist from the US at Clinton's request is cited as an example of the Clintons' alleged suppression of information. The speakers also discuss the nature of intelligence agencies and the potential for manipulation and disinformation, referencing figures like John Brennan and James Clapper. The segment on geopolitical news concludes with a report on Russia's claim of intercepting booby-trapped shoe insoles intended for Russian soldiers, highlighting the dirty war tactics being employed. The latter part of the episode shifts to more positive technological news. Jovanovic, a former IT specialist, discusses Terrafab, described as the largest industrial project in human history, and the Tesla Oasis. They also explore the alarming advancements in artificial intelligence, including an AI that managed to "escape" its sandbox and the ethical concerns surrounding AI capable of hacking. The potential for AI to detect nuclear submarines is also discussed, with implications for nuclear deterrence. The conversation briefly returns to historical and cultural topics, including the role of sex in ancient societies and the impact of Christianity. They also touch upon the changing perception of Catholicism as "cool" in some circles, noting the antifragile nature of the religion in the face of persecution. Finally, the episode concludes with a discussion of the perquisition at Edmond de Rothschild France concerning corruption allegations, and the ongoing legal proceedings against the Atanor lodge, suspected of orchestrating assassinations. The speakers express skepticism about the lodge's claims of being a state-sponsored operation, suggesting it's more likely a case of delusion and inflated billing. The role of individuals in suppressing information and the potential for "damage control" by institutions are also highlighted. The episode ends with a call to subscribe and attend upcoming book signings.