Le paradis est devenu un enfer pourquoi il à tout quitté

This video addresses a viewer's question about whether it's become risky to settle in Thailand in 2026. The speaker begins by acknowledging the comment and explains that they find it interesting and worthy of a response. They also mention a service, visataillande.fr, for visa assistance to Thailand, providing contact details in the description and pinned comment. The discussion then delves into the average salary in Thailand, which is stated to be around 12,000 baht for Thai citizens, equating to slightly over 300 Euros per month. The speaker clarifies that while this salary is low for expatriates, it's the reality for locals. They explain that Thai people are accustomed to managing such budgets, often living in extended families, which reduces housing costs. Furthermore, their needs differ from those of expatriates, who incur regular expenses for visas and flights back to their home countries. A key point raised is a comparison of quality of life between a Thai person earning minimum wage in Thailand and a French person earning minimum wage in France. The speaker suggests that a French person might have slightly more purchasing power in France. However, in terms of overall quality of life, the Thai person would likely fare better in Thailand. They elaborate that in France, a minimum wage earner, after covering rent and bills, has very little disposable income for leisure activities, leading to a monotonous "work-commute-sleep" routine. In contrast, Thailand offers a higher overall quality of life, characterized by a gentler pace, more enjoyable experiences, and numerous free or inexpensive activities. The speaker emphasizes that this is not about material wealth but a global sense of well-being. They observe that even Thai people with limited financial resources often appear happy, smiling, and content. The video then moves on to advice for those considering settling in Asia or elsewhere. The speaker strongly agrees with the commenter's suggestion to undertake multiple extended stays of three to four months to immerse oneself in the culture and daily life of a country before making a permanent move. They note that many young expatriates make the mistake of moving after only one or two short holiday visits. This limited exposure, they argue, creates an unrealistic, dream-like perception of the destination and prevents individuals from gaining the necessary perspective to plan a sustainable expatriation. This can lead to financial losses, being taken advantage of, and ultimately realizing that the chosen country is not a good fit, prompting regret and a desire to leave. The speaker then addresses a commenter's negative experience in Laos, where they stated they left because they were tired of the Laotian people. The speaker views this as a significant error, highlighting that disliking the local population makes living in a country extremely difficult, as one must inevitably interact with and adapt to the local community. They suggest that if one dislikes the people of a country, it would be better to stay home or choose a different destination. While the speaker had a brief, positive impression of Laos during a short visit, they acknowledge that the country is less developed than Thailand, lacking amenities like McDonald's. However, they also note that Laos is developing rapidly and is a beautiful country with good food and an affordable cost of living. The conversation shifts to the experience of living on an island, drawing from a commenter's five years of residence in French Polynesia. The speaker reiterates a common point they make: islands, in their opinion, are more suited for holidays than for expatriation. They explain that life on an island is inherently more complex and limited. Once one has explored the island extensively, boredom can set in. Travel off the island becomes expensive and inconvenient, involving either boat or plane. Furthermore, goods and services on islands are typically more costly. The speaker also touches upon the distinct micro-cultures found on different islands, emphasizing the need for expatriates to integrate and accept the local culture, as they are guests. The advice for Thailand, therefore, is to avoid the islands for expatriation, as they are primarily tourist destinations. Finally, the speaker addresses the sentiment that locals in Asia make it clear they are "at home." The speaker validates this, stating that it is precisely the case – they are in their own country. They argue that locals have every right to make expatriates feel like guests rather than homeowners. The core message for expatriates is to integrate and adapt to their new environment, rather than imposing their own culture or preferences. They stress that expatriates are visitors, and if the situation does not suit them, they should leave. The speaker firmly rejects a "colonizer mentality" and emphasizes that after five years in Thailand, they are aware they are a guest, not a resident. They have adapted to Thai life and rules, which suits them well. The speaker concludes by stating that trying to be perceived as Thai is a mistake, as it is not possible due to differing origins and heritage. Expatriates will always be seen as "farang" (foreigners) in Thailand, and this is a reality to be accepted without issue. The video ends with an invitation for personalized consultations via email or Instagram, and a call to action for viewers to subscribe, like, comment, and share their thoughts on the topic.