
Is Living in Vietnam or Thailand Better? I tried both
Audio Summary
AI Summary
This comparison between living in Vietnam and Thailand, particularly for those looking to build a long-term life, family, and business, argues that Vietnam currently offers a more advantageous environment. The speaker, who has lived in both countries, notes that while Thailand in the 2010s was a vibrant destination for travel and partying, it has evolved, and not always for the better, especially when considering long-term settlement.
The speaker highlights significant changes in Thailand. Chiang Mai, once a serene mountain city, is now a tourist hub, a "digital nomad zoo" with new condo developments and cafes filled with influencers. The burning season from February to April brings hazardous air quality, a concern for families. The islands, while still beautiful for diving, have seen a substantial increase in accommodation costs, with bungalows that once cost $20 now going for $80-$100 a night. This indicates that the "secret" feeling of finding an undiscovered place is gone, as the world has found and priced it.
Bangkok, however, is acknowledged as having improved, becoming an "extraordinary world-class city" with better public transport (BTS), food courts, malls, and Michelin restaurants. It is more cosmopolitan than it was 15 years ago. Yet, this comes with "world-class prices," with decent one-bedroom apartments in prime areas costing $900 to $1,500 a month. Visa rules have also tightened for Americans, offering 60-day stays instead of 90, and border runs are now scrutinized, leading to unpredictable immigration decisions. Thailand's bureaucracy is described as constant, unpredictable, and often not aligned with plans.
In contrast, Vietnam, particularly Ho Chi Minh City, has been undergoing rapid development. Seven years ago, it felt "unvarnished and raw," with new buildings constantly emerging and roads being built. This momentum and energy have amplified, making Vietnam of 2026 more "hyped up, more fired up, more excited about the future and the possibility." Unlike Thailand, which is perceived to have plateaued, Vietnam is still evolving, building, and in "genuine discovery mode." This means there is still room to "build something that is actually yours" and find uncluttered neighborhoods not yet overrun by digital nomads. This ability to shape one's life rather than inheriting an existing structure is presented as a significant advantage for long-term decisions.
Regarding the cost of living, Vietnam is presented as a clear winner, being "40 to 50% cheaper every single month" for a similar quality of apartment and standard of living. For instance, a modern one-bedroom in Da Nang costs around $600, and in Ho Chi Minh City, about $800, even in expensive neighborhoods. This contrasts sharply with Bangkok, where an equivalent apartment could cost $1,500-$2,000 a month. This cost difference is seen as crucial for building wealth abroad versus merely surviving.
On the food front, Thailand, especially Bangkok, is given a slight edge for its variety, exceptional food courts, 7-Elevens, and international cuisine. However, Vietnam's street food, like pho and banh mi, is considered equally good or better, and significantly cheaper, at around $1.50 per dish. Vietnam also wins on health and portion sizes, making the overall cost comparison for food still lean heavily in its favor.
The visa situation is deemed a toss-up. Both countries offer long-term options for those with resources and patience, but neither has a perfect long-term visa for Americans. Vietnam offers a straightforward 90-day visa for $25, with predictable bus runs for extensions. Thailand provides 60 days, but border runs are less reliable. While other countries like Malaysia or Cambodia might offer easier long-term residency, for Vietnam versus Thailand, the visa situation is not a decisive factor, as many expats successfully manage it in both.
Safety is where Vietnam is believed to "end the debate" for families. Vietnam is described as "genuinely, measurably, remarkably safe," with almost no violent crime and strict gun laws. The speaker feels secure walking alone at night, leaving laptops unattended, and allowing children to play in the streets. This ambient calm and lack of constant vigilance are highlighted as a profound benefit that many coming from Western cities quickly notice. Bangkok, while not as dangerous as some other cities, has a different "ambient risk profile," with tourist scams, motorbike snatchings, and areas with higher crime or fights that are absent in places like Da Nang or Saigon. This safety profile is a major, underrated advantage for families in Vietnam.
In terms of infrastructure, Thailand currently leads, particularly with Bangkok's world-class BTS public transit, excellent private hospitals, and extensive retail infrastructure like 7-Elevens and malls. This makes daily life in Bangkok feel smooth and efficient. However, Vietnam is "running fast" to catch up. Fiber internet speeds in Da Nang and Ho Chi Minh City are noted as exceptional. Private hospitals are improving yearly with European-built facilities and internationally trained doctors. New metro lines and international airports are under construction, indicating a rapid pace of infrastructure development. The key distinction is that Thailand's infrastructure is largely "built" (past tense), while Vietnam is "building" (present tense), meaning the existing gap is shrinking and will likely continue to do so. Living in a country that is actively building feels "alive."
Regarding traffic, language, and community:
Vietnam's traffic, especially in Ho Chi Minh City, is described as a "specific kind of chaos," a "living organism" of scooters, honking, and unpredictable maneuvers. Bangkok's traffic, while also bad, is more about sitting still in an air-conditioned car.
Vietnamese language uses the Roman alphabet, making street signs and menus readable from day one, even if meaning isn't immediately understood. Thai script, however, is a completely different system, leaving new arrivals functionally illiterate until significant effort is put into learning it.
Community-wise, Bangkok's expat community is decades old, established, and has a strong social scene but also comes with hierarchies, cliques, and unspoken rules. Vietnam's expat community is newer, more open, still forming, and less judgmental. Vietnamese people themselves are described as warm, curious, and not yet "burned out" by foreigners, making the social landscape welcoming.
In conclusion, Thailand is seen as a "finished product"โa magnificent country, beautiful islands, and an extraordinary city in Bangkok, ideal for first-time visitors, high-earning digital nomads seeking polished experiences, or wealthy retirees. However, it's a party that "peaked a while ago," with set and rising prices. Vietnam, conversely, is "not finished." It's still discovering itself, open-armed, with unpriced neighborhoods, cities not overrun, and an optimism that is rare. It offers the opportunity to shape one's own version of life rather than accepting a pre-existing one, with honest costs, a warm community, extraordinary food, and an open future.