Marion Sigaut : les dessous du nouvel ordre sexuel (wokisme, LGBT, EVRAS, etc.)

Marion Sigaut discusses the "new sexual order," a concept she explored in her 2017 book, "Sexual Rights or the Programmed Destruction of Childhood and Family." Her interest in this topic arose from a personal discovery of "pedocriminality" after moving to the countryside. She was horrified by the reality of a global network involved in child abduction, abuse, torture, and disappearance, a reality she found many people initially dismissed. Current events, however, have validated her concerns about the severity of this issue. Sigaut's research led her to the work of Judith Reisman, now deceased, who exposed the "sexual revolution" as an imposture. Reisman argued that this revolution, initiated during World War II and gaining prominence with the Kinsey Report, was based on the fraudulent premise that children are sexual from birth. Alfred Kinsey, a zoologist, not a human sexuality expert, was funded by the Rockefeller Institute and protected by the CIA to subvert the global order. Sigaut asserts that Kinsey's work involved the torture and abuse of hundreds of children, with their reactions of terror being misinterpreted as orgasms. These "discoveries" became the foundation of the new global sexual order, which is now being implemented worldwide. The new sexual order, as Sigaut described in her 2017 book, entails public authorities interfering in family intimacy, promoting "sexual rights" or the "right to enjoy." This includes access to pornography, the right to change sex, and the promotion of homosexuality as a normal and natural option, despite its historical marginalization. Sigaut views the idea of gender transition, particularly for children, as delusional, fueled by external influences rather than natural development. Since 2017, Sigaut notes a significant shift from recommendations to legal obligations regarding sexual education in schools. She points to the 2021 Blanquer circular in France, which mandates recognition and individualized support for children who self-identify as transgender, even at kindergarten age. This circular legitimizes the concept of self-proclaimed gender identity, demanding that teachers use new names and recognize children's chosen gender, potentially against parental wishes. Sigaut highlights a troubling aspect of this legislation: while it initially requires parental consent for gender identity recognition, subsequent legal texts, like Article 371 of the Civil Code (2019), redefine parental authority. This article states that parental authority must be exercised "without physical or psychological violence" and that parents must "associate the child in decisions concerning them according to their age and degree of maturity." Sigaut argues that this redefinition effectively criminalizes normal parental actions, such as saying "no" to a child, which can be interpreted as psychological violence. This creates a pathway for public authorities to intervene in families and remove children if parents do not agree with the prevailing sexual revolution ideology, a practice she describes as "epidemic" and a "monstrosity." She further explains that if a minor is deemed to be in danger in their family environment, potentially due to parental disagreement over gender identity, an "information préoccupante" (worrying information) can be transmitted to a departmental cell, or a judicial report can be made to the public prosecutor for minors. This process, previously used for abusive placements, now extends to situations where parents resist the new sexual norms. Sigaut believes this provides new arguments for breaking up families and that thousands of children are being removed from their parents in France for this reason. Education Minister Pap Ndiaye, following Blanquer, observed that sexual education laws were "poorly applied" and emphasized the need for new measures to ensure compliance, citing "public health objectives." These objectives include reducing early pregnancies and combating sexually transmitted diseases, even in young children. Sigaut finds this absurd, arguing that these issues arise precisely because sex is being discussed with children at an inappropriate age. Parents are reportedly devastated when they realize the implications of these changes, with some children returning from school in tears. Individually, parents feel powerless, fearing that protesting will lead to the removal of their children by social services. Sigaut emphasizes the need for collective action to challenge these laws and hold accountable those within social services who engage in criminal behavior, such as "détournement de mineurs" (abduction of minors) and "attentat à la pudeur" (sexual assault). She notes that there is a "business" behind child removal, with an "economy of child withdrawal" generating profit. Sigaut urges people to "wake up" to the reality that the Epstein affair has shed light on child predation, which is now being institutionalized through laws that promote early sexual education for children's "well-being." She contends that this traumatizes children, makes them vulnerable to forced sexualization and abuse, and ultimately, disappearance and murder. She credits Judith Reisman with understanding this "horror" long before others. Regarding mental hygiene when confronting such disturbing realities, Sigaut advises against delving into the explicit details of atrocities. She believes it's crucial to understand what is happening without exposing oneself to graphic content, which can lead to psychological distress, desensitization, or paralysis of action. Instead, she advocates for seeking and speaking the truth while protecting one's sensitivity. Sigaut expresses satisfaction with the release of the Epstein files, believing it's only the beginning of revelations, particularly concerning France, which she describes as "pedoland." She argues that France has been targeted for destruction through these networks because it historically resisted certain "filth." She criticizes the light treatment of such cases in the justice system, citing the Jack Lang case as an example where only his daughter faced charges. Sigaut's primary concern is what is happening in schools, leisure centers, and sports clubs, which she finds abominable. She highlights the pervasive nature of these issues, even in rural areas, and the "shroud of silence" that descends when someone protests, indicating the involvement of many individuals. She believes that revealing the full truth is the only way to effectively combat these issues. Sigaut's historical research, including her book "La Marche Rouge," has uncovered historical pedocriminal networks, demonstrating that such systems have existed for centuries, but are now openly institutionalized. She concludes by mentioning her latest works: "Sexologie et mensonge," which details Judith Reisman's fight and critiques French "progressives" who have rehabilitated figures like Gilles de Rais, and Reisman's own final work, "Réhistoire pour tous." She also discusses updated re-editions of her previous books, including "Du kibboutz à l'Intifada," "Mansour Kardoch," and "Femmes de Palestine," which explore the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and interfaith cooperation. Other re-editions include "La Marche Rouge," "Le Tournant de la Régence," and "Les procès en sorcellerie et l'inquisition," which re-examines historical events with new insights.